Wed 10 Sep 2008
It’s been more than a day since Roger Federer proved once again that he still has it besting Scot Andy Murray in straight sets to make tennis history becoming the first men’s singles player to win five straight at two different grand slams.
That the remarkable 27 year-old Swiss Maestro was able to reel off five in a row at Wimbledon (2003-07) and here in New York at the U.S. Open (2004-08) is even more unbelievable and speaks to just how special a player he really is. With so many questioning if he could win a slam in what’s been a challenging year by his extremely high standards dropping a semi down under to eventual champ Novak Djokovic and then losing twice to Nadal (routed at French) including the epic five setter at Wimbledon, a determined Federer elevated his level besting the world’s No.3 player in four sets and then turning back the clock to take apart the new No.4 first-time slam finalist Murray 6-2, 7-5, 6-2 becoming the first to win five in a row since Bill Tilden.
This was a great story seeing Roger rise up to claim No.13 of what he promises won’t be his last drawing plenty of cheers and laughter from a very supportive Arthur Ashe Stadium crowd Monday. It puts him only one behind Pete Sampras’ slam record 14. As difficult as the road ahead should prove with archrival Nadal, Djokovic and now Murray adding his name to the list of serious contenders, I believe Federer will win the required two majors passing Sampras who ironically enough he edged in a three set exhibition at Madison Square Garden earlier this year.
Feds is still extremely hungry and has something left. The serve is still there as he demonstrated against Djokovic blasting 20 aces. The forehand is still one of the best in the game and when many including myself questioned why it was misfiring more than usual particularly in that five set fourth round struggle versus a game Igor Andreev, he rediscovered the winning formula fixing his movement taking the right steps and ripping that inside out forehand we’ve grown so accustomed to seeing for many huge winners.
There also was the rebirth of that Sampras-esque backhand which was always the more underappreciated shot of Pistol Pete as well as Roger which sometimes could go off. But there he was cracking it crosscourt and going down the line with verve when he needed it most.
Federer has been able to put together this amazing run over the past five years by playing mostly from the baseline even though he’s more than capable of attacking at the net finishing points there like he did effectively to get past Andreev in a smart tactical adjustment. After that win allowed him to begin to see the finish line where he usually performs so well which might explain the unheard of 18 consecutive slam semi appearances, the Swiss spoke of how his Beijing Olympic doubles experience winning gold alongside countryman Stanislas Wawrinka helped add more confidence at the net. This can only be seen as positive moving forward because in the future, he might need to volley more if he wants to add to his legacy.
Is he the greatest? Tough to say. We never got to see a Sampras in his prime challenge Federer with those images still clear of Roger striking that perfect backhand return winner up the line before dropping to his knees ending Pistol Pete’s dominance on Centre Court at the All England Club. In catching a special on Sampras over at The Tennis Channel, I watched still mesmerized by some of the unreal rallies he was able to win beating the greatest returner in the game fellow American Andre Agassi during their 1995 U.S. Open Final.
People forget how great a ball striker Sampras really was moving just as fluidly as Roger does. But he also had an even better serve able to dominate opponents dialing it up a notch or two for those big aces to climb out of triple break point. Then there was the textbook volleying with that deft touch which was what made him such a special once in a lifetime player. That he was one of our own along with Andre who himself after not putting in the work went on to win eight majors made it that more meaningful. The greatest tennis rivalry featured a couple of Americans who carried every bit of respect that Federer and Nadal have for each other today.
The biggest difference is it was so much easier to promote our stars as Nike portrayed with those classic tennis commercials with Pete and Andre taking to the streets of Manhattan bringing the net with them.
Who didn’t love it? This was as good as it got for tennis fans here. Our sport needs that again. It would help if Andy Roddick could just find that extra gear and beat a Djokovic instead of what he says firing up the Serb in a quarter defeat. It would also be nice if James Blake didn’t always fizzle out though he had an excuse this year worn down from all the travel which included a fourth place finish in Beijing before best friend Mardy Fish dismissed him in Round Three.
So, where’s the next American star? Donald Young showed flashes in a highly entertaining first round night match versus Blake which went the distance. Big server Sam Querrey gave Nadal all he could handle in a fourth round encounter which went four before the new world No.1 prevailed. He certainly shows promise. With a little more seasoning, you have to believe the promising 20 year-old Californian will be on the upswing the next couple of years.
For now, there’s Federer and Nadal with Djokovic and Murray right behind as they’ve separated themselves from the pack. That’s why it should be interesting to see what happens at this year’s Masters Cup and takes home the hardware.
No matter what happens the rest of the way, Federer again proved why he’s arguably one of the greatest players to ever pick up a racket. We’ll never really know how he’d have fared against a Rod Laver or Sampras. But what he has accomplished against some pretty stiff competition speaks volumes for how driven he really is.
Nobody can ever question him again.




