May 2007


Originally, we posted the first part of this entry before. But it was too big. So we’re reposting the Ottawa side of things where earlier in the day head coach Bryan Murray and team captain Daniel Alfredsson were interviewed about this year’s Stanley Cup Final.

We’ll be providing interesting info, etc. in the days leading up to Monday’s Game 1 between the first two 90’s Expansion teams to meet for the Cup when Anaheim plays host to Ottawa.

Here’s what Murray and Alfredsson had to say:

An Interview With:
           
SENATORS
COACH BRYAN MURRAY
DANIEL ALFREDSSON
            DAVID KEON: Hello, everyone. I’m David Keon of the National Hockey League’s Public Relations Department. I’d like to welcome you to today’s Stanley Cup preview conference call. Thanks to Phil Legault of the Senators and Alex Gilcrest of the Mighty Ducks of helping set this call up. On Monday night, the Stanley Cup Final opens in Anaheim, when the Ducks will host the Ottawa Senators at 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time.
           
With us now we have Senators Head Coach Bryan Murray, who is making his third trip to the Finals, first as a head coach. Thanks to Bryan for taking the time to join us today and answer your questions. Operator, we’ll open it up now.
            Q. I was wondering if you could for me assess Wade Redden’s performance and progress through the season in the wake of Chara leaving, and with Volchenkov and Phillips, seemingly you’re getting more accolades deep into the season and into the playoffs. Do you think it’s been a benefit for Wade, because for so long him and Alfredsson have been a focal point for the team in good times and bad?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: He came out of training camp with a fairly serious groin problem, and it seemed to linger a fair amount through the first part of the year, at least.
            I thought in the second part he started to play better. But the big improvement in Wade Redden has been in the playoffs. I think he’s, number one, just moving his feet a lot better. He’s much more involved. He’s playing more minutes now pretty much than anybody on our defensive core.
            And there’s no question with Volchenkov and Phillips improving and being the shutdown pair, really, that it has taken a little attention and a little pressure away from Redden, I believe.
            But you know he’s a real quality guy, quality player, and an important guy off the ice for us, too, in that he’s not a big talker. But when he talks I think everybody listens. So his leadership has really come into play at this time of year. All in all, I think he’s much improved over the first half of the year, in particular.
            Q. What prompted your decision to use Alfredsson with Spezza and Heatley at the start of the playoffs and to continue with it, given that Alfredsson had kind of jumped around line to line during much of the season?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: I think a couple things happened. Mike Comrie, given the chance to play right wing, improved his play and was able to play with Fisher’s line. I think that was important that we got some secondary scoring out of him. In particular the early part of the playoffs.
            I knew that the big line, or the Alfredsson Spezza Heatley combo worked and worked really well when I left them together last year and then the early part of this year. I was a little nervous about stacking it all together. Going into the playoffs I even thought kind of separating them for the early games in particular.
            But in my wisdom, or lack of it, I left it alone, and they have performed to a good level and have been able to handle the match ups to this point in time. So I didn’t want to tamper with that.
            But I think the biggest thing of all is that other lines start to play a little better and play well together and it allowed me that ability.
            Q. Given the Stanley Cup drought since ‘93, can you tell us what it would mean to winning the cup to not only Ottawa but the whole nation; do you feel you’re Canada’s team now at least for the next couple of weeks?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: For the couple of weeks we have a chance to be that. I think there’s such an interest and a fascination and emotional attachment to hockey in Canada that when you are representing the country, I think that it’s remiss not to think that everybody gets or most everybody gets caught up into it.
            So I think that’s a great thing. I remember when other Canadian teams like the Montreal Canadiens won the Cup, whether we were Montreal fans or not, we’re attached to that fact.
            Right now in the city of Ottawa, the involvement in the game, the emotion, because of the position the team is in, has certainly brought a lot of pride to the community. So it would mean a lot. There’s no question.
            As I say, I hope we’re Canada’s team and I think at least for now we are.
            Q. Wanted to ask you, to what degree do you still feel attached to Anaheim or you sort of ?? you helped build that team to some degree. And you know a lot of the staff you hired. Many of them are still there. A lot of the guys you work with still there. To what degree do you still sort of identify or feel part of Anaheim?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: Well, it’s been taken over by Brian now, and it’s certainly his team. And I think any time you leave, you leave people behind that you have attachments to. But I really enjoyed my time there.  I thought we had a great staff in the office as well as in the field of scouting and hockey department. We have some players that they did a heck of a job on as far as drafting or signing as free agents out of college.
            We traded for Rob Niedermayer, and there were some guys there, when I coached, there’s still a few left. So there’s always great interest. I mean when they were playing other teams, I watched very closely.
            So there is an attachment. However, we do understand that you move on and in our business in particular and you move on and you have to worry more about and be attached to your own people.
            But some good friends. Some good people running the team. Brian Burke and I are good friends. So I guess it’s going to be a real healthy competition. It will be very interesting for me. Maybe more than if we would have played some other team. But to say my focus right now will be totally on Ottawa.
            Q. There’s lots of people that have made the move from coaching to the management ranks.  And fewer that have moved back. Can you sort of walk us through the reasons for why you put yourself through that particular type of hell and whether it’s been worth it?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: You’re right. Normally guys come back this way. Really as I said to Tony, I enjoyed my time in Anaheim. Good attachment. Disney owned the team at the time, of course. And they were outstanding as far as allowing me to do most anything I wanted to without paying consequences or worrying about how they were going to react.
            So it was a good job. I think the big issue was first of all I enjoy coaching. I enjoy being around the players on a daily basis. And it was my home area. I’m from a family. I’ve been away for  years and I thought it was an opportunity for myself and my family to kind of reconnect with brothers and sisters and parents.
            And so that was certainly part of the consideration. The other, without any doubt, the other part was I thought Ottawa had some talent here. I thought there was a real chance to do what we’re doing now. And fortunately for me it worked out that way and I’ve had a lot of fun doing it. I feel almost like a young guy again being back on the ice on a daily basis and being around these kids.
            Q. It has been worth it?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: I think it has been worth it.
            Q. One of the key match?ups for your team will be combating or defensing the Getzlaf line that the Ducks use. Who are your key players in that role?
             COACH BRYAN MURRAY: This is the dilemma we’ll face: We have Volchenkov and Phillips, who would normally play against the big scoring line on the other team. These three kids are huge. They’re good with a puck. They’re a threat every time they’re on the ice. However, they also have the McDonald Selanne line that offensively do a great deal for them. So game to game we’ll have to play it by ear. There’s no question that the two shutdown guys will play part time against the Getzlaf group. But we may have to have other people do a real good job there if we’re going to contend.
            Q. The playoffs provide players an opportunity to make a real break?through after a less than spectacular regular season. I wondered if you could comment on how the current playoff run has made people sit up and take notice of Joe Corvo.
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: Joe, when he came here, I think like a lot of free agents that sign and go to a new situation, I think the money or the length of the contract gets stuck in the road quite often. I think it’s always made that when you pay a guy a fair number of dollars to move the expectation from the media, the fans and the staff, are very high.
            And I think they’ll come in here with high expectations of themselves. At the beginning, our team wasn’t great. And Joe wasn’t great. He put a lot of pressure on himself. He had a couple of games where he had give?aways and the finger was pointed fairly strongly at him.
            However, what happened in the last month and a half before the playoffs, he started to get playing. We put him on the power play more often. And now he’s had a real break?through as far as getting back to the level of player we thought he was when he was signed.
            And there’s no question people have to recognize that this guy has been a real big factor in our team.
            Q. Your recollections of a playoff run in 2003 and is it going to seem odd to be back in the building on a different side?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: It is going to be a little different, there’s no question about that. In particular because we haven’t had a chance to play against the Ducks other than last year.
            So that will make a difference. Back in ’03 we went to Detroit in the first game and Luc Robitaille hit the crossbar in overtime and we found a way to win that game after getting outplayed.
            And it seemed from that point on the players started to believe they could win. Giguere was obviously great. Keith Carney, you go down the list of guys that were there that just played terrific for us. Somehow or other we found a way to win games in tight spots.
            So I remembered very clearly. You don’t get that many trips to the finals. But you don’t remember games and individual things that happened. But that was a great run, great time, and I’m sure when we go back this time the fans will be very much into it and have high expectations again.
            Q. You talked about your attachment to this team. When you saw them win against Detroit, did you feel any sense of pride considering the factor that you were in their development? And also on the ice, what’s the biggest challenge against the Ducks that you haven’t faced do you think in these past few playoff series?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: Sure, I took a lot of pride in it. I watched the young kids and the GM gets credit, but the staff, the scouting staff did a heck of a job and pushed me in a couple of cases to draft guys that are now big players on that team.
            So you always like that. You always feel good when players that you look at at 18 years of age develop into stars in the NHL. Beyond that ?? what was the second part. I’m sorry I rambled too much.
            Q. What’s the challenge of the Ducks that might be different from what you faced in early years?
            COACH BRYAN MURRAY: No question, goaltending, Giguere, he’s real sharp. The big two defensemen on their team, the mobility they have. And again the size of the kid line. Those are the real challenges that we have.
            DAVID KEON: Thank you very much, Bryan.
           
DANIEL ALFREDSSON
 
            DAVID KEON: With us now we have Senators Captain Daniel Alfredsson, who leads the playoffs with ten goals, including four?game winners and the game win in overtime to defeat Buffalo in the Eastern Conference Finals. He has played in every one of the Senators 94 playoff games in franchise history.
            Q. Daniel, I know there will be a lot said about obviously the playoff failures in the recent years or so. But I want to ask you, you pretty much grew up with this franchise when it came into the league in ’93. Can you just talk about just the process of growing up along with the franchise and can you even relay just a couple of things, just even the early years when you guys weren’t very good and just kind of having to work through that?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: My first year, ‘95/’96 was obviously an interesting year, being a first year, a lot of new things. We had a tough year as a team. I think we won 14 games. Dead last.
            It started to change when Jacques Martin came in, in January that year and took over as the coach. He really got us playing much or more of a defense?style game, playing with less skill than most teams. We had to really look after our own end. And I think it had results pretty much right away. The following year we squeezed into the playoffs for the first time and I think we lost to Buffalo in seven games.
            We’ve been in the playoffs ever since. But even though we’ve had some failures, I think this franchise has done a lot of great things. Playoffs 10 years in a row. Scouting staff has obviously done a great job scouting some great players throughout the years.
            It’s been an evolution here and we had a couple of disappointments. Some really good teams. Changes were made and Murray came in. I think he’s been able to take us to another level.
            Q. What are the challenges that Niedermayer and Pronger pose for a forward that maybe haven’t been seen through the first round of the playoffs. And second, following Anaheim, most of these playoffs, they tend to play a checking line against a scoring line. So I expect you’ll see a lot of Sammy Pahlsson, who you played with during the lockout, can you tell us about the challenges that he presents?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: First, Niedermayer and Pronger, I don’t know too much about Pronger, to be honest. I haven’t seen him play much this year at all, appeared here and there in the playoffs. But obviously a big guy. Makes good plays with the puck as well. Niedermayer, great skater, one of the best.
            So I think the challenge for us is make sure they work every shift. Get the puck in deep. Make them work in the corners. And for our line if we play against them, I think play with the puck as much as possible.
            And for Samuel Pahlsson, I played with him during the lockout and in the Olympics. He’s just a smart player. Very strong. And determined player. Works hard every shift and a good face?off guy.
            Q. Daniel, did you think at the start of the playoffs that you would be with Heatley and Spezza? Bryan seemed to waffle on that and is that the line you’re most comfortable with?
DANIEL ALFREDSSON: I played with them and Fisher throughout the year. I felt comfortable with both lines. We knew depending who we were going to play, we talked about if we played New Jersey in the first round that I would play with Schaefer and Fisher to spread out the scoring a little bit. And if we played Pittsburgh I would play with Spezza and Heatley because we played well against them. They don’t really have a checking line in that way like New Jersey does. But, yes, I feel comfortable with them. We had some good success last year. We’ve kind of built on that this year.
            Q. Would you talk a little bit about the excitement in Ottawa, are people pretty fired up?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: Yes, they’re extremely fired up. Obviously it’s a little bit ?? it’s not as high now as it was Saturday night or Sunday after we beat out Buffalo, but I think everybody is real excited to get going.
            I know our home games is going to be crazy. It’s going to be an unbelievable atmosphere in our building, no question. It’s a lot of fun walking out around town for small periods of time, not too much. But it’s been a fun time.
            Q. I wanted to ask you, when do you think you and your teammates started believing in Ray Emery behind you? He came in not as number one starter at the beginning of the year and really has had to earn his way. But it seems like you guys are pretty confident with him back there. And I wondered when it all began?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: We’re very confident with him. He played real well for us last year when Dom was here. When he got his chance Ray played extremely well. Started out everybody didn’t have a great start for us this year. But as things turned around Ray got some opportunities to play and he played really well. And he’s been really consistent.
            And I think that’s the key with him. He’s in there every night giving us a chance to win, and our record, the second half of the season, is a big part of his play, because we know we could score goals and he made us some good saves every night.
            Q. You mentioned before that Bryan Murray helped take this franchise to another level. I know earlier in the season when we were there everybody in town was saying that his job was in jeopardy. Can you talk about some of the things he’s done specifically to help turn things around this year, and also some of the things he’s done that kind of changed the mind set of the team the last couple of seasons?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: I think the biggest thing we’re a much better forechecking team. We focus more on playing the trap and now we can force two guys, one guy depending on the team we play against. Brought a different dimension there. And I think his leadership, obviously coach or GM, when we started the way we were, going to get questioned.
            But his leadership throughout our top times was crucial to go back. He was poised during that time and I think that reflected on us and that’s why we were able to break out of it.
            You know he said you can’t control everything that goes around. You just gotta worry about the guy next to you and play for each other. And he was pretty blunt about it. He said possibly if we don’t win the next few games, there will be changes. I might be gone and he knew that was the way it was. But he believed in us. And we were able to turn it around.
            Q. Can you talk a little bit about what you guys went through in terms of the financial issues with the team and whether the team was going to be in Ottawa and contrast it out to where you’re at now, how hard was it to go through not knowing whether you were going to be in bankruptcy, who was going to own the team, that kind of stuff?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: It was hard times, no question. But for us players, we talked about it quite a bit. We talked about it with our (indiscernible), and he was up front about it. At the end of the day the best thing we could do is go out and win games to get people to jump on board and the season ticket drive that was going on. We felt we wanted to stay in this city, there’s no question.
            And I think we played really well under a couple of weeks period there. And obviously now with the change in ownership for us and the stability we have now, it feels really good to be able to still be in Ottawa.
            Q. This is the first time you’re taking on the Ducks this season. Talk about if it adds to the intrigue of the Stanley Cup finals by facing a team that you have not seen before during the regular season?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: Both yes and no. I think sometimes it’s good to have a little bit of a history with the team, maybe. But we played them once since lockout, and it’s ?? I don’t know too much about them, to be honest. We’re going to have some video sessions here the next few days and go through them a little bit more.
            But obviously I know some of their players: Samuel Pahlsson and Selanne; Niedermayer, when he played in Jersey here. And Pronger I haven’t seen play a lot, mentioned as one of the best defensemen in the game today. Good team. You have to be to get to the finals.
            I’m sure everybody is going to be excited to see what kind of game it’s going to be when we start Monday.
            Q. Brings up whole new challenges for you guys?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: No question it does.
            Q. You have more goals this playoff than before, obviously, playing with Heatley and Spezza helps. But also from watching it seems like maybe as opposed to years past you’re taking more shots yourself and the forwards, more quality shots as opposed to trying to make the highlight play. Has that been a goal or something that you guys have been cognizant of through the playoffs or like other things is it just the things that are just falling into place more this year than previous years?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: I think every coach in this league is on their players to shoot the puck more, there’s no question. Especially in the playoffs. I mean there’s not a lot of bad shots. You’re going to try to get people crashing the net and get it tipped in and go off someone. So you definitely want to try to shoot the puck when you get a chance.
            For me personally, I think I wasn’t much of a shooter when I came into the league but it’s something I worked on throughout my career here. And I’m definitely a better shooter now than I’ve been in the past.
            Q. Wonder if you could comment on what Joe Corvo has brought to your power play this year?
            DANIEL ALFREDSSON: I think mobility. He’s so quick, first three, four steps. And when he gets the puck on their blueline, he can really move laterally and draw some attention to dish it off to either side for a shot or open something up.
            And in today’s, especially in the playoffs when the penalty killing is so good, it’s tough to create chances. I think you have to have movement in there. And he’s one of the best at it.
Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

We’re providing the Anaheim side of things in its entirety here. It got cut off in our first entry:

An Interview With:DUCKS COACH RANDY CARLYLE
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER
DAVID KEON: With us we have Anaheim Coach Randy Carlyle, who has taken the Ducks to Western Conference Finals in both years behind the Anaheim bench coaching his first Stanley Cup Final.
Q. How did your playing days and maybe specifically any time you had in Pittsburgh help to shape you as a coach?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: Well, I think as a coach, you try to take some of the positives that your previous coaches had impacted on your career. Like Eddie Johnson was a guy that brought in a power play sequence when I was in Pittsburgh as a player that worked along the same lines as a basketball picking system.
And it took the NHL officials a while to figure out what we were doing with it. But I think we scored 109 power play goals that year with it. Stuff like that.
I think you always look back on some of the things and experiences that you had as a player positively or negatively. There’s just some things I won’t do because as a player I hated doing them.
And I think it’s important but you can analyze which ones your team likes versus what you did personally. And I think that’s important, also.
Q. Some captains put their stamp on the team. Others don’t. Can you describe Scott Niedermayer’s impact on this team?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: It’s huge. Obviously a player of that caliber has the ability to play the huge minutes. I think the one thing that you can say about Scott Niedermayer, he has a calming effect to your group. When things get a little hairy, and they always do at certain times, he has the ability to just slow down the tempo or speed up the tempo at the right time.
He’s not a very loud boisterous individual. You see the way he plays. He’s very unassuming in the way he handles himself. But I would say that the number one asset for him as a person, with our group, he has the ability to calm things down and calm people down in tense situations.
Q. Do you think he got that by being in the finals four times?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: I think it’s all part of the experience. I think if you know his personality, that doesn’t change because he’s been in the finals. I think it’s just the type of person he is. Obviously being there and lived it, when he does make statements, it carries a lot of weight. And as I said he’s not a real huge talker, but he’s an individual that when he talks it carries a lot of weight. That’s for sure.
Q. Randy, what are the advantages and disadvantages of being a top-heavy team with one principal scoring line, as Ottawa seems to have right now?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: I don’t think they’re top heavy so to say. I think they’ve got lots of balance in their lineup. Obviously the Spezza, Heatley and Alfredsson line has statistically led them through this playoff series so far.
But they’ve got lots of depth in their hockey club. They’ve got lots of skill on the back end. I don’t think that they’re what I would describe as a one-line hockey club. I think they’ve got lots of fire power.
Q. Could you comment, please, on Ottawa’s power play. Certainly have big three up front and then they have Redden and Corvo on the blue line. What’s your impression, what’s the scouting report on that power play?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: Obviously they’ve got lots of skill. I think they use Redden as their quarterback. He’s the guy that dishes the puck off. They’ve got Spezza on the sidewall. Heatley is a big body in front of the net, moves in and out. And Alfredsson, I don’t know if there’s a more dynamic player right now at this time of the year than what he’s brought to the table.
Obviously with Redden in the back end, Corvo is a shooter. He’s more of a guy that can shoot the puck. He’s got a big-time shot.
So they’ve got all their weapons and they move it around very, very effectively. What you have to do with them is there’s times to pressure and there’s times not to. You’ve got to keep that thing tight. Try to push them outside of the shooting lanes and keep things to the outside.
It’s a difficult task and they’ve had lots of success so far in the playoffs.
Q. The situation with not having played Ottawa this year, not having played them here since I think 2003, we were just listening to Daniel Alfredsson on the previous call here, remarkably sounded like he had never watched Chris Pronger play hockey almost before. Can you talk about that total lack of familiarity that exists with these series now?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: I know I’ve watched a lot of the Ottawa Senators, and I’m sure their coaching staff has watched a lot of our games. Players might have a different viewpoint in watching hockey. I think there’s not a lot of things that do go by that you don’t pay attention to.
We live and eat and sleep the game. And specifically in the playoffs everybody’s glued to the TV. And we’ve taped all the games. We watch what teams are doing because the successful teams are the ones that you’d like to emulate. You’d like to steal some of their, if they have a face-off play or they’re doing something that they’re having success with.
And I think that all coaches and all people from the coaching side will pay a lot of attention to what’s going on in the playoffs. But the players, they might have a different viewpoint on it. Depending on the time difference, too. A lot of players, probably, we always get that our fans don’t stay up and watch our games because if it’s an 8:00 start, it’s past midnight before it’s over for them.
Q. Ottawa, it’s billed as Canada’s team in this championship series, but in the last game there were 14 Canadians on your team and 13 on Ottawa. So would you like to contest that perception there?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: I think obviously the passion that the Canadian hockey fan has for the game, they always utilize that as a motivation factor. For us, we’ve got lots of Canadians, and all our coaching staff is Canadian. Our general manager is American. There’s a lot of Canadian content to it. It’s two hockey clubs. It’s not the U.S. versus Canada as we perceive it. But I think that’s just a marketing tool for some people.
Q. Wondering if you could assess your squad right now coming off that tough six-game series and how do the guys feel about taking on a Senators team that looked very solid in the first round?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: I think like us we take a workman-like attitude towards any of the groups or teams we’ve played so far. Our mandate is not going to change. Obviously when you get to this point, you know that the opponent that you’re facing has achieved quite a bit. And as we have.
We show a tremendous amount of respect to our opposition. We know that they’re a hockey club that might be what people are describing are playing the most consistent brand of hockey at this point. And that’s a challenge for us.
We have to play better than we played in the last series. We know that. We’re expected to do that. And that’s you don’t get here by smoke and mirrors. You have to earn your opportunity to play in the Stanley Cup finals. And the Ottawa Senators have done that and the Anaheim Ducks have done that.
Q. Do you know Bryan Murray very well?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: No, not at all. I know Bryan previously, he was a coach in the league when I was playing in Pittsburgh, was in Washington. And when I headed out to Winnipeg, he coached there. Very little off-ice interaction with him.
Q. In light of the injury to Chris Kunitz what kind of contributions have you gotten from the spares, guys like Joe Motzko and Ryan Carter guys who played all the season with the Pirates?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: We looked to those players late in the last round against Detroit, because we felt with the Carter kid, a big, strong, physical for us could be strong down low in the puck.
Motzko was more of a skilled guy but his role would have to change if he was going to play with us on the fourth line. We found those kids went in.
We didn’t use them a tremendous amount, five or six minutes in each game, plus it’s important that you have the big bodies in the defensive side of things and able to provide energy. And I thought both players did.
Q. Do you think back on the subject of playing Ottawa for the first time. Do you think the fact you’re playing a team for the first time, aside from the fact it takes different ways to prepare, does it really add to the marquee value for a Stanley Cup Final?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: Again, it’s a good hockey club we’re playing. And you know they’ve accomplished a lot. Because we haven’t played one another, I don’t think it has as much bearing that the people are making it out to be. It’s two good hockey clubs that are going to meet. Seven-game series. Obviously they’ve done some things very well. And we feel we’ve done enough to earn our opportunity here. And it should make for a great final.
Q. How did the combination of the disappointment from last season’s playoffs and the expectations you guys had coming into this season as one of the favorites help you to sort of break through in the west?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: Again, I made the statement before that when we lost to Edmonton last year, we made a statement that mediocrity was not going to be accepted. When we broke up as a group at the end of the playoffs we were pretty down, but we had taken a lot of strides.
Our young players had started to develop and were making contributions. And we built our hockey club based upon the success that we had that playoff run.
Then the exclamation point for us and our whole organization was when we acquired Chris Pronger. And that set everybody’s mind that we were going to be very, very serious about what we’re going to do. And the players were very committed right from the start of training camp. And we had that core group. There wasn’t a lot of turnover. There was maybe three or four guys that left the hockey club. With the acquisition of Pronger and some of the younger kids, we were back, everybody was on the same page right from the first day of training camp.
We were expecting a lot of ourselves, and we were a group that was committed to getting a good start out of the gate. We had a tremendous start. And I think that really was the kick-off point for our hockey club. And we’ve just tried to ride the wave since.
Q. I was wondering if you could just give me your thoughts on why perhaps your checking line with Sammy Pahlsson and those guys has been a little more offensively successful in the playoffs than they were during the regular season?
COACH RANDY CARLYLE: Again, we talk about it all the time. When you play the number of minutes that those people were getting, that offense was expected. They had to provide some offense.
I think it’s a perfect case of playoff-type goals. Those are the tough ones. And those players have been able to raise their offensive production, and it was a welcome sight, because we had asked of them throughout the season that you’d have to shoot the puck more.
You’d have to do this on the offensive side more.
And now they’re getting rewarded for their amount of effort and the commitment that they’ve made. And we would shudder where we would be without them.
DAVID KEON: Thanks very much, Randy.
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER
DAVID KEON: Now our final guest is Ducks Defenseman Scott Niedermayer, playing in his fifth Stanley Cup Final, three-time Stanley Cup champion. Recorded three goals, six assists for nine points appearing in all 16 Duck playoff games.
Q. How satisfying is it to once again compete for the Stanley Cup and did you for even a second consider that it might not happen after leaving New Jersey?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Well, obviously, I think every player loves the opportunity, whether you’ve been there before, whether it’s your first time.
It’s an exciting place to be. It’s a place you want to be, obviously. So I’m really looking forward to it. Getting older and these chances don’t come along every year. So it’s going to be a lot of fun for sure.
And as far as expecting to be back there when I left New Jersey, I don’t know. You always think that’s your goal. That’s where you’re trying to get to. That’s where you think that you’re going to be at the end of the year. Otherwise I don’t know if you would sort of start the year or whatever. So I think every year you start that’s your goal that’s where you want to be and I guess that’s where you see yourself being.
Obviously it’s very difficult to achieve and you understand that. But you do believe that you’re going to get back there.
Q. Does it get harder as you get older?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Harder to get back there?
Q. To make the runs, to make a long run like this.
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Well, personally, I feel good. Physically and everything. So in that sense is it harder, no. But I think you understand that it is hard to do and to have success in the playoffs, it’s very intense. It’s physical. It’s a huge challenge. And you do realize that more and more every year as you’ve been around, for sure.
Q. Scott, you played with some real good checkers in Jersey. Where does Pahlsson fit in as a checking forward?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Well, he’s done a great job for us the last couple of years in the role that he’s asked to play. I would say in some senses he’s a little different than those two guys you mentioned, just sort of the way he plays. He’s probably a little bit bigger, stronger, relies on that a bit more.
Whereas those guys maybe rely on their skating and quickness and whatnot more to play defense. There’s definitely different ways to have success. But they’re all great, great defensive players. And I just heard the last question to Randy. You need well rounded scoring as well. And all those players you mentioned at times have provided, are capable of providing offense as well.
So I’ve been fortunate to play with some great defensive players like you said.
Q. Scott, traditionally hockey has faced a lot of challenges getting noticed among other pro sports in southern California. Can you talk about playing here as compared to back east in terms of the fan interest and do you think you have a chance to win some new fans now?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: I’m sure obviously definitely you could get a little more attention as you get further into the playoffs. And hopefully we are taking up a few more fans as we go.
As far as what it was like back east, in some senses it was similar. Playing in New Jersey, sort of a market close to a major market of the country, basically New York. In some senses you’re sort of in that shadow a little bit as maybe we are here of LA a little bit.
But those are big questions. Those are bigger questions than one question can change ordeal with. We go out there. We perform as hard as we can.
Hopefully the people that watch and see what we’re doing enjoy it and have fun. And really that’s as simple as it can be, and that’s the way I look at it.
Q. We were listening earlier to Daniel Alfredsson talk about two teams really haven’t seen much of each other at all this year. He was saying how he really had very little sense of Chris Pronger, to name one. I was just wondering how it is with yourself and your guys with, how much do you really know about Heatley and Spezza and those guys having not played I suppose too many games against them?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: That’s a different challenge now that we’ll face. That does happen when you get to this stage and you’re playing the team from the other conference. We’re both in the same boat.
I guess personally I have played some of those guys a fair amount. So I’m somewhat familiar with them as they are with me. But there are some young guys, some guys that have been out west here that haven’t played against each other a lot. That’s a challenge both sides have to deal with.
Does it make a little different dynamic and whatnot, for sure? The first little bit will be far different than playing any team you’ve played eight, ten times counting exhibitions possibly at the start of the year.
Q. What does Randy bring to this team in terms of both attitude and from a strategic standpoint?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: I think he’s very straightforward. Simple and straightforward, and I think that makes it very clear to the players what he wants.
And that’s what he expects. And I think a lot of guys appreciate that. There’s definitely different ways to deal with situations and whatnot. But he’s very direct.
As far as strategy, I think he’s, I don’t know, it’s sort of hard to answer that question exactly. But he likes aggressive hockey. He likes hard work. I think obviously that leads to success. And that’s the biggest thing to have success in the playoffs and playing hockey is commitment and hard work.
He demands that. He asks for that. And he likes to be aggressive and sort of goes well with the personnel we have on our team.
Q. Even though last year ended and the expectations going into this year how tough of a task did he have to steer the team to this point?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: I think you get that close and you get a bit of a teaser of what it’s like, I think that really motivates players. And just on its own. But when expectations are that high and things are expected, that’s a challenge, for sure.
And we started out very well. We had a bit of, sort of a lull there mid-season. That’s a challenge, just to keep things positive and have the team come out of it okay. There’s definitely been challenges for us this year and he’s been a big part of it.
Q. Randy Carlyle talked about the boost that the acquisition of Chris Pronger gave the team as far as a mental state going into this season. What did you think when Pronger was acquired. And is there a comparison to be made when you played with Scott Stevens here and now having you and Chris Pronger in Anaheim?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Obviously when we did acquire Chris last summer, you know initially it’s sort of a hard to believe scenario, as we just finished playing each other in the conference final and had so much success. So it’s kind of a training situation. But obviously to add a player like that, you’re excited.
He had been around. There was no secret as to what he can bring to a team. And when you get a player like that to be on your side, you’re excited.
As far as for me to compare playing with him and playing with Scott, you know I think in a lot of ways there are some similarities. Sort of different style players, both Chris and I and Scott and I were different. We weren’t out there trying to do sort of the same things. A lot of fun playing with players of that caliber and being able to be back on the blueline paired up with them in different situations.
I guess Scott and I were a little, our ages were different and sort of as I was kind of improving and getting older and learning things, he was moving on in his career. So in that sense that’s probably the biggest difference, I guess.
Q. I’m just wondering if you can talk a little bit about Giguere about not just the way he plays but having a world-class goaltender having it on the ice and off the ice and can you compare it to Marty Brodeur all those years?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: I’ve been fortunate obviously to play in front of good goal tending, which it’s no secret it’s a huge part of having success in hockey and the playoffs. Playing in front of Marty basically for the first 12 or plus years of my career. I mean what more can anyone say about how good he’s been and what he’s done.
Then coming here and playing in front of Jiggy and Bryzgalov, talented guy, when he’s been in, very capable. It’s been great. I’ve been spoiled in that sense to be able to play with and in front of those type of goaltenders. Makes your job as a defenseman, you have that confidence to allow certain shots or certain plays to develop knowing your goaltender is going to handle those. It’s very important, for sure.
Q. I assume this is what you had in mind playing for the Cup for when you joined your brother in Anaheim, this is the whole idea behind the thing?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Yes. I don’t know if I would say it was the whole idea. We’ve enjoyed traveling together during the regular season, going out for dinner on the road. Having him come over here or going over to his house when we’re in town. So there’s a lot more to it than just here wanting to get to a Stanley Cup final and trying to go from there. But it’s exciting to be able to compete together and then to be able to step up and be in the finals together is tremendously exciting.
It’s obviously a lot different than it was four years ago, I guess, when we were facing off against each other. So it will be a good experience and obviously something we’ll remember.
Q. Talk about the challenge of playing a team that you rarely see as opposed to teams you’ve just been battling so many times throughout the regular season.
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Well, obviously it would be more video. There will be going over more sort of tendencies and whatnot of the opposition, just because like you said we haven’t seen them a lot. We’re not as familiar with them. Teams in our division that we’ve played eight times. We can probably put together a video on our own just knowing how certain players do things. So we’re going to have to pay a bit more attention in those meetings and try and learn as quick as we possibly can.
But once a series starts to go, you’ve got a game or two under your belt, you become pretty familiar pretty quickly when the games are played this intensity and this hard.
The rivalries and those things develop fairly quickly.
Q. I assume you were watching a little closer than usual in the last series, watching Ottawa; is that correct?
SCOTT NIEDERMAYER: Well, you would watch definitely a little bit of that hockey when you’re on the road in the hotel the night before the game you do see those games.
I guess as the series developed you figure Ottawa has the lead and that would probably come out. But at the same time we had our hands full trying to deal with our situation here. So I don’t think we were looking too hard at who the opposition may be. I think we had to deal with what was right in front of us initially and go from there.
DAVID KEON: Thanks very much, Scott.
Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Our pic of the day comes courtesy of East Rutherford where Blazers NBA Rookie of the Year Brandon Roy and GM Kevin Pritchard react to winning the NBA draft lottery last night. The Blazers, who won 32 games (one less than the Knicks folks) had their slim 5.3 percent chance come through to pull an upset over the NBA’s worst Memphis and the Celtics:

Happy as can be are the Portland duo of NBA Roy Brandon Roy and GM Kevin Pritchard.

With a core which includes the gifted Roy, LaMarcus Aldridge, Zach Randolph, Jarrett Jack, Travis Outlaw and Martell Webster, the Blazers certainly have a young nucleus in place where selecting either Greg Oden or Kevin Durant could just vault them back into the playoffs.

The question is what will Pritchard do with the moody Randolph. The former Spartan is a talented player who averaged a double double (23.6 PPG, 10.1 RPG) in 68 games. He turns 26 later this summer. Does he fit in or will Portland finally trade him? He’s a solid scorer and rebounder but is injury prone and has had his reputation questioned.

Maybe the Blazers go in a different direction here. Winning the No.1 overall pick gives them many options. Will some team make them a can’t miss offer to move down that puts them into serious contention sooner than people expect like ESPN’s Jon Barry asserted to the shock of Stephen A. Smith at a roundtable discussion?

You never can tell. Especially with a franchise which once passed on Michael Jordan, Charles Barkley and John Stockton to select Sam Bowie second overall over two decades ago.

With the Grizzlies and Celtics upset (if you saw Jerry West’s face and Boston’s Lottery Party reaction you know- not even kidding here! :lol: ), the Sonics moved up to No.2 while the Hawks were third which was good news for them because had they dropped further, that pick would’ve gone to Phoenix (gulp). Instead, the Hawks boast both the 3rd and 11th overall selections. They desperately need a point guard. So figure Mike Conley, Jr. to fit the bill there with one of those picks.

Memphis, Boston and Milwaukee (NBA’s three worst teams) slipped to fourth, fifth and sixth respectively.

So, does anyone want to try to caption this pic of a demoralized West. Just look at it and his reaction:

Jerry West wears a look of disgust after NBA Lottery shafts his team.

“It’s about as disappointing as you could ever hope for. It’s like pitching pennies. It’s grossly unfair to the team, but I’ve said it before, I don’t think the lottery is fair. I never liked it. I don’t think it’s a good system at all, period.” :D :lol:

What a bitter old man. As if he didn’t have a lot of luck when he built those championship Laker teams. You chose to work in Memphis when you could’ve ridden out to the sunset. Take it like a man or just do everyone a favor and get out!

Does anyone want to put a real caption on that sad photo? Any takers?!?!?!?!?!

The Bulls had the rights to the Knicks’ pick as part of the Eddy Curry deal. The good news for lifetime man Isiah Thomas is that Chicago wound up with the ninth pick. They should still get a good player (Joakim Noah???) but at least it’s not the dreaded worst case scenario of either Oden or Durant.

Here’s the full lottery results with the draft in NYC set for June 28th:
1.Portland

2.Seattle

3.Atlanta

4.Memphis

5.Boston

6.Milwaukee

7.Minnesota

8.Charlotte

9.Chicago (from Knicks)

10.Sacramento

11.Atlanta (from Indiana)

12.Philadelphia

13.New Orleans

14.L.A. Clippers

One quick thought on Vince Carter’s demand for a three-year $60 million extension:

No freaking way the Nets and Rod Thorn do that. As the NY Post’s Peter Vecsey pointed out in a Tuesday column, the 30 year-old small forward is slowing down which also might explain the more predictable bail outs in Vince’s game against smaller defenders. He’s still explosive but just not as consistent. And as I’ve pointed out here before, the former Air Canada has never been a clutch playoff performer.

It’s time for the Nets to move on. If that means signing and trading the superstar, then they should do it. They can definitely find a taker and get something back for him.

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Tony Parker sliced and diced the Jazz to lead the Spurs to a 2-0 series lead.

Tony Parker’s playoff career high 14 assists along with 17 points helped the Spurs slice and dice the Jazz to the tune of a 105-96 Game 2 home victory to take a 2-0 series lead in the Western Conference Final.

For the Jazz, it’s the second time this postseason they’re in an 0-2 hole. During the first round, they trailed the Rockets by the same deficit before rallying to take the series in seven games. However, as point guard Deron Williams pointed out afterwards, being down two to the championship calibre Spurs is a lot different:

“We still have a chance. But I think it’s a lot worse to be down 2-0 to the Spurs than the Rockets. They have championships and guys who know how to win. They’re also a much better road team.”

The splendid soph understands how difficult a task it now becomes for his team to comeback. They’ll need to be more consistent when they return home to Salt Lake for a must win Game 3 Saturday night.

One thing they need to do is get off to a better start. The Jazz never led during last night’s game and trailed by as much as 22 in the second half as Parker and the Spurs’ outside shooters along with Tim Duncan (team high 26 along with 14 boards, 5 blocks and 4 assists) toyed with them to set a franchise mark by making 13 three’s.

After a close opening quarter in which Utah trailed by just two, they had another brutal second getting outscored 32-17 to be put in a huge hole down 17 at the half. A little friendly advice for Jerry Sloan’s young club: Falling behind by that much against a battle tested team such as San Antonio is a recipe for disaster.

It’s just too much to climb out of. The same thing happened in Game 1 which was almost an identical margin of defeat (8 pts instead of 9). By the time they started playing better at both ends to cut the deficit to only seven in the final quarter, it was just a little too much to overcome. Twice, Parker got into the lane and setup Bruce Bowen for uncontested treys from each corner. The defensive stopper connected on three-of-four from that distance for all nine of his points.

If you are letting Bowen beat you, you got problems. Nothing against the gritty defender who works as hard as anyone. But when you’re facing the Big Three of Parker, Duncan and Manu Ginobili who also added 17 points (three from downtown) along with four rebounds, three assists and two steals, you better not allow a secondary part to hurt you.

Aside from that, savvy perimeter veteran Michael Finley also knocked down three trifectas adding 11 points in 23 minutes along with six rebounds. Even unheralded center Fabricio Oberto followed a surprising 14 in Game 1 with another 14 on an efficient six-of-seven from the field- also grabbing seven boards. If he’s scoring in double digits, Utah has no chance to win this series.

So much must change for the Jazz to get back in it. Aside from dynamic duo Williams and Carlos Boozer, who combined for 59 points, 19 rebounds and 13 assists, they just aren’t getting enough support thus far. As promised Andrei Kirilenko was better Tuesday night finishing 5-of-11 from the field plus five-of-seven from the line to contribute 15 points and three assists. But with only three rebounds and a block in 37 minutes, it was un-Drago like. The versatile small forward needs to do better in that area on the interior to help turn the series around.

If Kirilenko improved, then center Mehmet Okur was once again a non-factor finishing just 4-of-13 for 11 points. He did step out and make two three’s but unless he’s a consistent scoring threat inside and outside, the Jazz don’t have a reliable third option.

Derek Fisher, who was so good against the Warriors had a dreadful night making just one-of-nine field goals and misfiring on all four three’s for only three points in 30 minutes.

Another problem for the Jazz is their lack of bench scoring. Against Golden State, it was a polar opposite. Last night, they got outscored 28-8 with both Ginobili (17) and three-point specialist Brent Barry (9 on all treys) getting more than the trio of Paul Millsap (4), Gordan Giricek (2) and Matt Harpring (2). Only Harpring got major minutes (27) as compared to 18 total for the other two. Problem was the former Georgia Tech two sport star was ineffective.

If Sloan is only going to use eight in his rotation, then they better perform at a high level because Gregg Popovich has the luxury of bringing Ginobili, Barry and Robert “Big Shot Bob” Horry off his bench which makes it a potent weapon because all those guys have experience and are used to playing big minutes. The San Antonio coach also hasn’t been afraid to use backup point guard Jacques Vaughn to spell Parker and even has given time to center Francisco Elson throughout the Spring which means he can rest Duncan when needed.

It also means Popovich isn’t afraid to go 10 deep which means his key players should be fresher in crunch time. That spells trouble for the Jazz.

They’ll now have three days off to regroup before Saturday. We’ll see what Sloan comes up with to make this interesting. The good news is they usually play great on their own home court. They have some of the best fans in the NBA who make a lot of noise and support their Jazz very well. You know they’ll be behind their team trying to rally them.

We’ll see what happens!

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Final score: Detroit logo 3 Anaheim logo 4

Anaheim wins series 4-2 to advance to second Stanley Cup Final in four years.

For two periods, the Ducks seemed completely in control up three goals against the Red Wings and on their way to a second Stanley Cup Final appearance in four years (three seasons).

But the Wings had other ideas and made Anaheim and the entire Pond building sweat out a wild ending till that final buzzer sounded with fireworks, a relieved exhale from Duck players and the celebratory handshake.

If Detroit had little to offer the first 40 in which they were overwhelmed on the scoreboard 3-0 and outshot 26-13, the top seed wouldn’t roll over in the final 20 making the Ducks earn victory.

They would pepper Jean-Sebastien Giguere with 16 shots and launch a desperate all out attack to try to make up two three-goal deficits. After Henrik Zetterberg struck on a nice redirect finish of a Chris Chelios pass to cut it to 3-1 at 3:15, their comeback temporarily stalled 2:39 later when Selke candidate Sammi Pahlsson scored a huge goal finishing off three-on-two by backhanding home a Rob Niedermayer rebound past a sprawled out Dominik Hasek to restore a three-goal lead with 14:06 left.

From that point, it was hang on for dear life. The Wings got shots on Giguere from everywhere by pinching their D and moving the puck quickly up the ice. But it would be the power play which gave them new life. With Todd Marchant in the box, it took Pavel Datsyuk only 14 seconds to deflect home a Nick Lidstrom shot pass and slice the deficit to two with 9:52 remaining.

One shot. One power play goal. A sharp contrast to how their first four went in which they managed just one shot the first two periods.
With time running out on their season, Detroit got another chance when Ryan Getzlaf went to the box for cross checking with 3:13 to go. If you thought Datsyuk’s last tally was quick, his next one was even faster. This time, the Wings’ No.1 pivot took a Henrik Zetterberg feed at the doorstep and whipped a wrist shot past Giguere for his eighth- using just nine seconds to suddenly cut the margin to one with a lengthy 3:04 still on the clock.
The way Detroit was coming now, that final 184 seconds must’ve felt like an eternity to Anaheim. When Travis Moen was whistled for a hook 21 ticks later, it gave Detroit a third consecutive man-advantage to try and tie it with 2:52 left.

They came oh so close when Datsyuk’s rebound attempt of a Mikael Samuelsson shot narrowly missed going in the open side.

Detroit coach Mike Babcock waited until there were 10 seconds left in the PP to pull Hasek for an extra attacker. Should the ex-Ducks coach who led them to the 2003 Final have done it earlier? Debatable.

What we do know is Tomas Holmstrom came very close to tying it in front on one of those deflections. Anaheim couldn’t get the puck out a couple of times making for a frantic conclusion. Had Detroit hit the net, maybe they score. There certainly was enough traffic in front.

The last chance came when Todd Bertuzzi missed one wide with 31 seconds left. Anaheim would clear the zone. Detroit would make one last dump to Giguere’s left. But Chris Pronger was positioned perfectly waiting for it and flipped the puck high in the air. Detroit was unable to keep it in and get off a last shot as time wound down touching off a celebration on one side of the ice while dejection set in at the other bench.

One can only wonder where this sort of desperation was from Detroit the first two stanzas. They fell behind a goal 3:51 in when Rob Niedermayer got the back of his skate on a Pronger point shot for a shorthanded goal.

The Ducks were much better in this game while the Wings were on their collective heels getting outshot 14-7. If not for Hasek, it would’ve been worse.

Anaheim continued to pepper Hasek in the second, who did all he could to give his team every opportunity to respond. All night, the big line of Getzlaf, Dustin Penner and Corey Perry were dangerous. A dominant shift by the young trio resulted in the second goal from Perry. On a delayed penalty call, Perry snuck in from the right side to find a Francois Beauchemin rebound and stuff it home at 9:52.

The Wings finally started to pick it up getting a couple of chances on Giguere but he was equal to the task. After killing off an Anaheim PP, the Wings had a terrible change resulting in a costly too many men on the ice bench minor.

It took Getzlaf 29 seconds to convert by getting to a rebound Todd Marchant dug out before Hasek could freeze it for a huge PPG which made it 3-0 with 87 seconds left in the period.

At that point, it looked like it would be an easy Game 6 clincher for the Ducks. Little did they know how close Detroit would come to forcing sudden death. They can breathe easier and start preparing for Eastern champion Ottawa. The Stanley Cup Final won’t get underway until next Monday at The Pond on Versus.

Can anyone explain why there’s such a long layoff? Good old NHL. We can’t.

Some quick hits:

1.Pronger is going to his second consecutive Stanley Cup Final with two different teams (Edm, Ana). He’s not the only player though as Ottawa backup goalie Martin Gerber represented Cup champ Carolina as they went on to defeat Pronger’s Oilers in seven games.

2.After getting blown out 5-0 in Game 3 on home ice, the No.2 seeded Ducks rallied to win the next three games to eliminate the higher seeded Wings. The comeback will be remembered for how close they were to going down 3-2 before Scott Niedermayer’s late PPG tied Game 5 preempting Teemu Selanne’s OT heroics. Selanne will finally reach a Cup Final in his 15th season. He notched an assist tonight to extend his point streak to three games (2-4-6).
3.Getzlaf and Perry were terrific tonight and contributed two goals and a helper. They were flying all game. Their size and speed gave Detroit fits. Look for their line along with rookie Penner to be a factor against their next opponent Ottawa.

4.Datsyuk’s late heroics gave his team a chance. He nearly completed the natural hat trick on a third PP but might’ve grazed the post on his stuff attempt. Before this postseason, the top center who signed a big extension (7 years, $46.9 million) was never a big playoff performer. After inking his new rich deal, the Russian took some big steps this Spring by scoring eight goals and adding eight assists for 16 points in 18 games.

5.If Datsyuk was good, then Detroit captain Lidstrom was his usual self this Spring. In defeat, the four-time Norris winner added an assist to increase his point total to 18 (4-14-18)- most among all defensemen. The model of consistency on the blueline might’ve come up a little short but as usual logged a plethora of minutes. In defeat tonight, he finished minus-two in 30:13 with four giveaways. Maybe finally the 37 year-old anchor of the D wore down. Especially without Mathieu Schneider. He still teamed well with Chelios and did a sound job.

6.Though shots finished even at 29 due to Detroit’s strong third, the Ducks did a great job getting in the path of shots- blocking 17. Not only did the Wings have 17 blocked, but another 17 missed the net, meaning 34 shots never reached Giguere. Detroit wasn’t too bad in this area either blocking 11 including a game high five from ultimate warrior Chelios. Scott Niedermayer paced the Ducks with four. A little comparison of shots which didn’t get through:

Detroit- 34 (17 MS, 17 blocked)
Anaheim- 20 (9 MS, 11 blocked)
7.In a losing effort, the Wings were strong on draws winning 34-of-58 including a solid 16-11 from Datsyuk in the faceoff circle. Defensive specialist Pahlsson took many of those draws finishing 13-for-29.

8.Giguere was outstanding in this series and rebounded well from a tough Game 5 in which he was pulled after allowing three. He finished with 26 saves tonight while counterpart Hasek turned aside 25 of 29. Giggy was just a little better and sparked his team to victory.

9.Detroit won the physical battle outhitting Anaheim by two (23-21). Thirteen players registered a hit with no player getting more than three. Meanwhile, the Ducks had 12 players make the scoresheet with Pahlsson finishing with a game high five.

10.There will be a new Stanley Cup winner between two Expansion teams. The Senators reentered the league in 1992 after a 58-year hiatus. According to legend, the Original Sens franchise existed from 1893-1934 winning 10 Stanley Cups including one in 1927 by defeating Boston 2-0-2. Most of their championships came prior to the NHL assuming complete control of Cup competition. Now, the new Sens will try to add their name to the Stanley Cup when they take on the Ducks.

Originally named the Mighty Ducks for Disney’s hit movie featuring Emilio Estevez, they entered the league a year later in 1993. After a disappointing decade, they made a miraculous run as a lower seed to the Final in 2003 before falling to the Devils in seven games. A year after bringing in Niedermayer to captain the team and coming within a series win of another final, they traded for Pronger and now are back playing for the Cup against Ottawa in what promises to be a good series.
Only one will emerge as a new champion.

Our three stars:

3rd star- Wings logo Pavel Datsyuk (2 PPG, 4 SOG, 16-11 on draws in 24:05 TOI)

2nd star- Ducks logo Ryan Getzlaf (goal, assist, +2 rating in 21:30)

1st star- Ducks logo Jean-Sebastien Giguere (26 saves, 13 in final period)

Series MVP: Ducks logo Jean-Sebastien Giguere

Honorable mention: Ducks logo Teemu Selanne

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Chauncey Billups was quiet until the 4th quarter in Pistons' Game 1 ECF win.

The great players step up when needed most. In crunch time. Even on an off night in which he was kept silent by the Cavs’ D, Pistons’ guard Chauncey Billups never let that get to him in helping lead his team to a Game 1 three-point victory, 79-76 over Cleveland at the Palace.

Billups scored 10 of his 13 points in the final quarter to help his team pull out the hard fought win and take a 1-0 series lead in the Eastern Conference Final.

When his team needed him most, he stepped up and made some big shots by draining two three’s and completing a three-point play in a tightly played final 12 minutes.

The former 2004 Finals MVP made the biggest shot of the night with under two minutes left by knocking down an uncontested trey from the top of the key to put Detroit back ahead 78-76.

Cleveland had three chances to tie or win the game but LeBron James and Co. failed to get it done and steal home court when it was there for the taking. They would get the final two possessions but couldn’t capitalize.

First, James drove the lane, drew a double and fed big man Zydrunas Ilgauskas for a wide open 17-footer. But unlike most of the game where the center had the magic touch from that distance for a team high 22 on 9-of-17 shooting, he was short off the rim. The ball rebounded back out to James and coach Mike Brown called timeout to diagram a final play.

Truthfully, it wasn’t a bad play at all. Brown substituted long distance shooter and Game 6 hero Donyell Marshall for Ilgauskas. The recent 34th birthday celebrant entered the game having scored only two points on 1-of-3 from the field in nine minutes. Yet there he was on the floor. If you know the game, you knew he what the play was. So I wasn’t surprised when LeBron drove the lane and then found the ex-Uconn star in the right corner for an open three. But his shot fell off the rim and caromed out before Billups recovered it near mid-court and was fouled with 2.8 left.

After making the first for a three-point lead, he missed the second but it didn’t matter much as the Cavs had burned all their timeouts leaving just a desperation 75-foot heave from AndersonCarlito AKA Sideshow BobVarejao which never had a chance.

And so the Pistons overcame a poor first half to pull out the big ‘W.’

To be perfectly honest, much like what TNT’s Kenny Smith said, “Cleveland should’ve won tonight.”

That they didn’t probably doesn’t bode well for the rest of the series. As Smith, Magic Johnson and Charles Barkley concluded alongside Ernie Johnson, “That was probably the worst Detroit’s going to play.”

Which means Cleveland should feel like they missed a golden opportunity here. Sure. They can conclude as Ilgauskas did during a postgame interview with Craig Sager that “they were in a close game and had a chance to win and would take it.”

But those are the ones a road team has to win if they want to take home court at this stage.

Now to the TNT analysts’ criticism of LeBron’s decision on that final play. It’s hard to disagree because he’s supposed to be the best player on the floor. And if you watched enough replays, then you know that he had a step on solid defender Tayshaun Prince at the free throw line. The double also came late and as Rasheed Wallace (15 pts, 12 boards, game high 7 blocks) informed Magic and Co., he wasn’t coming over to help out but rather to get the rebound. When James gets a head of steam in full flight, he’s tough to stop because he’s so strong. He should’ve just gone for the lay-up and tried to draw the foul. Not once did the superstar get to the line all night. Instead, he passed out to Marshall, who missed on his chance to be the hero.

I’m only going to ask this once. But who would Cavs’ fans rather have with the ball in that big spot. LeBron or an ice cold Marshall who just got up off the bench??? Case closed!

Detroit was lucky to be only down six at the half. They were lackluster at the offensive end and were outworked by Cleveland on the offensive glass. Particularly Varejao who pulled down five of his eight rebounds in Detroit’s end and either got putbacks or setup teammates. The sparkplug finished with 13 on 6-of-9 shooting along with two steals in 26 minutes.

The Pistons were able to hang around thanks to Rip Hamilton and Chris Webber who combined for almost half their points.

After scoring nine in the first half, Hamilton was even better getting 15 of his game high 24 (11-of-21 FG) in the second half. The great mid-ranger shooter even dialed long distance twice. The ex-Uconn star made some difficult shots and also added seven assists and two steals in 43 minutes.

They got an inspired game from Wallace at both ends. He did a solid job doubling LeBron and also was terrific at protecting the basket rejecting a couple of James’ drives on his way to seven blocks. Aside from the D, he didn’t rely just on his perimeter game instead making six of his seven shots on the interior. He did make one big trey also in the final quarter but what else would you expect? He turned it up.

The Pistons didn’t get the usual scoring from top defender Prince who finished with just nine but the team oriented small forward still contributed mightily by playing solid D on LeBron while pulling down six boards and handing out nine assists including the big dish for Billups’ winner.

Flip Saunders lengthened his rotation by playing veteran big man Dale Davis. He contributed five points and three rebounds in five solid minutes. Aside from Davis, usual rotation bigs Antonio McDyess (2 pts, 4 rebs) and Jason Maxiell (1 offensive rebound and assist to setup Billups trey with 5+ left) gave the Detroit coach usual time.

For Cleveland, Larry Hughes shot 4-of-13 finishing with 13 and seven boards but continued to struggle from the perimeter misfiring on all three long range attempts. The Cavaliers need the versatile guard to make a couple of outside shots to keep Detroit’s defense honest.

They’ll also need more than the career playoff low 10 LeBron gave them. While it’s true that the unselfish superstar also grabbed 10 rebounds and dropped nine dimes just missing out on a triple double while also adding four steals, he needs to sometimes take over in these close games. Fifteen shots just isn’t enough. He needs to be more aggressive.
LeBron doesn’t have a great supporting cast. In crunch time, he has to make the big plays. That sometimes means getting the big buckets. We’ll see if he makes an adjustment in Game 2 Thursday night.

Later tonight, the Jazz will take on the Spurs in Game 2 looking to even the best-of-seven Western Conference Final series. They shouldn’t be as nervous as they looked in Game 1 when they fell 108-100. Look for Carlos Boozer to be better and expect another great game from super soph Deron Williams.

Utah was defended well by the championship calibre Spurs and the Big Three of Tim Duncan, Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili came through by combining for 71 points, 14 rebounds and 21 assists.

Williams (34, 7 and 9) and Boozer (20 and 12) will need more from bigs Andrei Kirilenko and Mehmet Okur who combined for just 17 points, 11 boards and one block.

After being taken to task by coach Jerry Sloan, expect the Jazz to come out more focused tonight.

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

Final score: Anaheim logo 2 Detroit logo 1 (OT)

Anaheim leads series 3-2.

This was about the most unlikely victory the Ducks could’ve gotten. It was highway robbery at its finest as Anaheim stole one which was within Detroit’s grasp but slipped away.

If you’re a Detroit fan, you’ve seen this act before. Game 2 anyone? How about Game 5? The Wings easily could’ve wrapped this series up already. Instead, they’re one game away from elimination and now must win Game 6 at The Pond Tuesday night to force a seventh game back in Hockey Town.

I’m fairly certain Wings’ supporters are sick of Jean-Sebastien Giguere stoning their team and stealing games from them. Especially in sudden death. Like 2003 wasn’t enough? The Anaheim netminder did it again making big stop after big stop to give his team a chance in a game they had no business being in- finishing with an outstanding 36 saves to back stop his team within a win of their second Stanley Cup Final appearance in four years (three seasons).

I was equally as amazed as NBC’s Brett Hull and Ray Ferraro that the Ducks won this game with such a poor effort. You just can’t play that way and expect to win at this time of year.

Yet because of the 2003 Conn Smythe winner, Anaheim was allowed to get away with it. They can thank Giguere by treating him to an expensive steak dinner after how well he performed. Sure, the lone goal he gave up to Detroit defenseman Andreas Lilja 6:13 into the second period was one he’d love to have back. Off a Dan Cleary feed, Lilja’s point shot snuck past his glove to put Giggy’s Ducks behind.

However, aside from that, he more than made up for it with some clutch stops including several from point blank range which could’ve put the game out of reach. After a fairly even opening stanza in which Detroit had three more shots (11-8), they peppered Giguere with 15 but only managed to beat him once on the aforementioned odd-man rush. Meanwhile, the Ducks got just three shots on Dominik Hasek hardly testing him.

If there was one thing they did well in a one-sided second, it was kill penalties. The Ducks lost their discipline going to the box four times after falling down a goal. But they repeatedly killled them off to hang around entering the third.

The Wings should’ve put this game away. No doubt about it. They blew two more PP opportunities including one which left just 2:19 on the clock for Anaheim to work with.

Aside from that, they did catch a bit of bad luck when Nick Lidstrom’s shot off a giveaway hit the right post behind Giguere with 9:01 remaining. That would’ve been huge give how well they were playing. From a physical standpoint, they were much better than their opponents.

Anaheim also wasn’t showing that they were capable of generating the type of chance it was going to take to get it tied. That’s when they caught a break when Pavel Datsyuk was sent to the box for interference with 1:47 left. Ducks coach Randy Carlyle wisely pulled his goalie for the extra attacker giving them a six-on-four.

The strategy paid dividends when Detroit penalty killer Johan Franzen failed to clear the puck which allowed a hustling Chris Pronger (booed all day) to keep it in. Ironically enough, it was Franzen that Giguere denied twice on an earlier power play to keep the deficit one for his two biggest saves.
Usually when you don’t clear it out, you get burned. That’s exactly what happened. Eventually, a three-on-one was created down low with Teemu Selanne feeding Scott Niedermayer in the slot. The Anaheim captain quickly settled the puck down and fired a wrister which changed direction going off a diving Lidstrom’s stick and then fluttered past a helpless Hasek to miraculously tie it with 47.3 seconds to go.

Just like that, a game Detroit dominated was going to overtime. In it, they had their chances. Valtteri Filppula just missed from about 25 feet when his wrister sailed wide. They also got their seventh power play when Travis Moen hooked down Danny Markov. But the Wings couldn’t come up with the goods. Tomas Holmstrom was setup nicely in the slot but his wrister which might’ve been ticketed for the back of the net was blocked by a sliding Duck. It was their best chance.

The Wings would lose ironically when Lilja had a dreadful turnover in front of his own net leading directly to an unassisted tally for Selanne for his second career OT winner. The Detroit defenseman circled his net but felt pressure from a backchecking Selanne and Andy McDonald. As he attempted his pass, the backcheck pressure from McDonald caused him to lose the puck giving the Finnish Flash a one-on-one with Hasek. Selanne faked forehand and patiently waited for the Dominator to go down before roofing a backhand for the winner at 11:57.

It touched off a nice celebration as a happy Selanne was mobbed by teammates. He’s always been a great finisher and one of our favorite players. Now the original Winnipeg Jet is a game away from his first Stanley Cup appearance. The 15-year veteran sniper who’s tallied 540 career goals during the regular season has waited a long time to get to this point. It would be nice to see him get there and have a shot at a championship.

Here was the OT hero’s reaction:

“Everything happened so quickly. You don’t have enough time to plan anything. But I’ve been practicing that move my whole life. I knew I had to get it up. He [Hasek] goes down and covers up everything down low.”

He didn’t miss. Now Detroit has their backs to the wall. We’ll see how they respond Tuesday night.

Some quick hits:

1.It was a tough game for Franzen because he played so well for most of it registering a game high eight shots in 22:00. Had he scored on a nifty redirect or on a rebound with a few minutes left, he would’ve been a hero. Instead, one error cost his team. The same also could be said for his teammate Lilja. That’s the breaks.

2.It’s hard to fault Hasek on either of the goals he allowed. One was deflected in by his own teammate to tie it while the other was off a brutal turnover which allowed one of the game’s most dangerous goalscorers to take advantage surprising the netminder. Maybe the 42 year-old six-time Vezina winner could’ve waited out Selanne a little more before sprawling out. It was a weird game for the goalie because he wasn’t all that busy and looked on his way to a routine shutout. Then in the blink of an eye, it changed. The pressure’s on for Game Six.

3.The Wings were the more physical team as it went on outhitting the Ducks 27-22. Markov and savvy vet Chris Chelios (45 years young) each paced them with four while Anaheim checking center Sammi Pahlsson led everyone with five.

4.Cleary was pretty effective in the loss for Detroit setting up Lilja’s goal and playing extremely well finishing plus-one in 22:33.

5.Todd Bertuzzi struggled to distinguish himself in this game. The big power forward even got out of the way of a Mikael Samuelsson point shot allowing Giguere to see it. After a couple of good games in a row in which he scored twice and setup another goal, he was ineffective and received just 15 shifts (12:01) getting only one shot. He’ll need a more inspired effort in the elimination game.
6.Henrik Zetterberg was held off the scoresheet despite six SOG. He and linemate Datsyuk were pretty good in this game but couldn’t get one by Giguere even though they combined for 10 shots and some solid scoring chances.

7.After a quiet first three games, Selanne has exploded for five points (2-3-5) in the last two Anaheim wins. They needed their best finisher to pick it up and he has come through.

8.The most effective line for the Ducks was the Kid Line of Dustin Penner, Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry. Getzlaf was very effective down low on the cycle creating a few opportunities along with Perry. They’ve been the team’s most consistent line all series.

Our three stars:

3rd star- Ducks logo Scott Niedermayer (tying PPG with 47.3 left, +1 in 35:13)
2nd star- Ducks logo Teemu Selanne (OT winner, assist)
1st star- Ducks logo Jean-Sebastien Giguere (36 saves and improved to 12-1 in playoff overtime-best in NHL history)

Add to Yahoo Add to Google Furl this Add to Spurl Save to Del.icio.us Digg IT! Live Bookmarks! Blogmarks

We’ll just call this quotes of the day, which come courtesy of some disgruntled Yankees on and off the field after yet another loss (10-7) to the Mets putting them five under .500 and 10.5 behind the Red Sox:

Yankee CF Johnny “DL” Damon: “It’s definitely embarrassing. We definitely know that we are better than we’ve showed.

Skipper “Clueless” Joe Torre: We’re going to turn it around. I wish I could give you a date. Until we straighten out what we need to straighten out, we can’t worry about the standings.

GM Brian Ca$hman: “We’re not out of the race. As ugly as it looks right now, I’m never going to let that enter my mind.

As a buddy once quoted, “Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt.”

Or as former WWE manager Slick would say, “The party’s ov—-ahhhh!”

It’s been over for quite some time. This Yankee team is so embarrassing that I’ve stopped caring. I no longer can watch them. They’re a disgrace to the uniform invoking memories of the early 90’s teams with players such as Mel Hall, Jesse Barfield, Mike Witt, Steve Farr, Luis Polonia, Rich Monteleone, Matt Nokes, Bob Geren, Tim Leary, etc.

Those teams played to a 3/4 empty Stadium sometimes. At least they had an excuse. Ah. How we’ve come full circle. Just wait until the spoiled wagoners who only jumped on because of all the winning start demanding refunds. Here’s a prediction: The Stadium will be half empty by August.
That Roger Clemens introduction in the Boss’ box was about as cheesy as it got. As if the 44 year-old Rocket is going to come in on his horse and save this pathetic team.

They should just admit failure and sell off the garbage such as Bobby Abreu, Kyle Farnsworth, Mike Myers. Heck. Even Mike Mussina can just get off the mound already.
There’s no way anyone can convince me that Torre shouldn’t be fired. He’s lost his mind and is just cashing a check. As for Cashman, he’ll probably take the fall for this. But ironically, some of the deals he made to restock the farm should make the team strong again in the future.

Of course, this team has sustained a ridiculous amount of injuries. Even yesterday’s winner Tom Glavine couldn’t believe their luck after Darrell Rasner went down yet again and will require surgery after taking a line drive in the leg.

Sometimes, luck changes. The good teams have it. Just look at the Mets. They get every break these days. Damion Easley has turned into a power hitter. Carlos Beltran didn’t check his swing in the eighth. Endy Chavez was a scrub until he got to Shea l